Month: August 2008

  • Would it Make Me Wrong?

    “Daddy!” The boy pulled on his father’s uniform shirt.

    “Yes, son?”

    “Why are they burning that lady?”

    “Because she committed adultery.”

    “Oh.”

    “Daddy!” The boy pulled on his father’s shirt again.

    “Yes?” Less patient this time.

    “I thought you testified at the trial that she couldn’t have done it because she wasn’t there.”

    “Well, Father William said she was guilty.”

    “Did Father William see her do it?”

    “No, he didn’t.”

    “Then how did he know?”

    “God told him.”

    “How does he know that?”

    “He’s a minister. It’s his job.”

    “But then Father William must have lied! You saw her somewhere else.”

    “Don’t say that! The devil deceived me and made me see things that weren’t there.”

    “How do you know it was the devil?”

    “Because Father William said so, and Father William hears from God.”

    There was a pause. “I don’t think so. I think you know what you saw. I think God would know what was true. I think Father William lied.”

    “Don’t say that! If anyone hears you, they might burn you!”

    “If they burned me, would it make me wrong?”

    [This is a work of fiction. Any resemblance to any real person or place is purely coincidental.]

  • Adaptation of Psalm 91

    April Lorier provides a poetic adaptation of Psalm 91 that I really appreciate.

    It is not a matter of theology, translation, or Biblical exegesis, but rather the fact that the message of the Psalm is expressed personally in a way that touched her heart, and in turn touches mine.

    This is one element of Bible study that I think is missing, and it is really one of the most critical–seeing ourselves somewhere in there. Adaptations help us to do that. Telling related stories will do that.

  • Review: The Golden Compass

    I hadn’t intended to watch this one because it didn’t sound all that interesting to me, and also because it didn’t sound like there was any reason for the controversy it has aroused amongst Christians.

    My wife, however, put it in our Netflix queue, and it duly showed up. She thought it would be something I’d want to watch, so watch it I did. On the first point, I would have to say it was more interesting than I expected. Let me note that I haven’t read the books, so I cannot compare the story as some have in their reviews. On the second, I see even less reason for this to be controversial than I did before I watched it.

    The movie features a very oppressive church like organization, known as the magisterium, and the young heroine goes against this with the aid of a bunch of magical creatures, witches, devices, and such. I find it mildly interesting that a movie that purportedly espouses atheism carries on its conflict with various magical (or supernatural) creatures and even includes a prophecy. Of course, that is simply a product of the genre.

    If I hadn’t been told that the author was an atheist, I would have imagined that the book was about a tyrannical church organization, and might have a broader lesson against organized religion generally. In fact, I think that is what most people will take from it. To go to the opposite extreme in terms of literary style, I would consider Atlas Shrugged, which many Christians enjoy despite a much more explicit and integral atheistic message.

    Thus I would simply take this as a fantasy movie and let philosophical debates fall where they may. As such I find it of about average interest. It is fun from time to time, but does not really leave one in doubt very often. The story line is good and the characters are generally interesting, but fall short of unique. The acting is again fine, but not great.

    It’s the sort of thing I would normally expect to put in my Netflix queue which costs me nothing extra to watch. Then I enjoy it quite a bit.

    In my view it’s good but not great. Numerical rating: 3